Is Privacy In The 21st Century Possible? Essay

concealing was once precious and comforted. But immediately with so umteen sensitive and convenient technological advancements, is concealing in the 21st century mathematical? To foster our concealment Congress created the Electronics concealment Acts (ECPA) to comfort us from government entrance path to undercover tuition that is transmitted and stored on the Internet, such as emails, private photos, or corporate data.Congress has non updated the ECPA on technology since it was created, in 1986. When the ECPA was created there was no World Wide Web, friendly networking was aroundthing in the future, and nothing was stored in what we birdsong the cloud. With all the technological changes in directlys society no genius is protected. solitude is defined as being free from the public eye. Yet we leave so umpteen tidy sum overlap own(prenominal) knowledge on tender networking websites, and government agencies monitoring emails, and phone rings well-nigh o f the time with come out of the closet our knowledge. There is no privateness in the 21st century, it is just a nostalgic feeling, and it is no longer practiced. nows loneliness justices arnt up to date with todays technology. Things are rarely sent by dint of the mail, and emails and textual matter messages have replaced write communication. Online messaging and societal networking was something of a novelty when justnessmakers created the ECPA (Frolik, 2013). A new article from the Dayton Daily news written by Cornelius Frolik on June 2013 he mentioned, The establishment endure easily access many personal communications and other private training without sufficient probable urinate. Instead of acquiring a phiz that requires more standards and procedures. presidency agencies instead bring subpoenas to obtain citizenrys emails, and telephone records (Frolik, 2013). Although, covering fireical anaesthetic government catch lots of dangerous criminals through info rmation online manage emails, photos, and social media sites like Facebook some critics still feel it is an assault of privacy.Also as our technology advances by leaps, and bounds so does the way brass uses new high tech tools to watch practice of law-abiding citizens. Though our quaternary Amendment states to protect the American spate from unreasonable searches and seizures. well-nigh everything is done throughtechnology in the 21st century. This meaning that government can seize any emails that are clxxx days or that has been opened without a warrant subpoenas have choke the closely used investigator tool for organization agencies. The reason why is because they can be easily written inside the prosecutors attitude without any further review from a judge.This means there is an excommunication to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, if it satisfies the requirements. The question we should be inquire when it comes to government and our privacy are Is to explain a clear understanding of the name privacy? If the administration cannot clarify the terminus privacy past how can they protect our privacy? The lack of clarity makes it severe for lawmakers to create new policies that will nurse our privacy out of harm (Libin, 2012). both reasons why privacy can be considered threaten in todays society one being the Government powers are limitless, and two being we the American heap expose ourselves digitally (Libin, 2012). The concourse of America should come together and aver for the Government to protect our privacy quite an than participate in warrantless searches (Libin, 2012). The fact that the Government can argue that the Fourth Amendment does not apply because there is no exception to privacy when it comes to protecting national security, then that leave the American people in times of calamity, and crisis.Laws like the ECPA is a law that the Government has an obligation to respect (Libin, 2012). The ECPA protect th e privacy of the electronic communications, but when law enforcement and prosecutors have to protect and enforce laws, personal information has to be collected to shit a case (Libin, 2012). The solution is more complex than simply, and right now the Government is facing difficulties figuring out the best way to protect the American people (Libin, 2012). Given all the information privacy seems to be the problem. It can be portrayed in many ways, one as its protecting the public from terrorism, and local crime and two being if you are innocent, what do you have to hide?In 2014 I find that most American people store their digital lives in what we call The Cloud which included emails, calendar data, photos, and other sensitive information. The ECPA has become obsolete. engine room today leaves the ECPA outdated, the laws have not changed since it was primitively createdin 1986. The existing privacy laws unless focus on the text-based personal records, and the issues that people fa ce today with this outdated privacy law is gathering of digital multi-media files, and the way this unauthorized data is used (Lipton, 2010). Do you consider word-painting inspection systems out on the street personal data? about may say yes and some may say no. concord to a case study researched by Jacqueline D. Lipton, if the face of an individual is recognizable, than it is considered personal data. Some people feel protected with the video surveillance capturing their every moment.Then on the other hand some people feel they are being scrutinized being watched by video surveillance. The U.S. has a egis for free speech and for free of a press under the First Amendment. until now there is no express complete right to privacy (Lipton, 2012). The question that American people should rigorously examine is whether or not Congress should repeal the ECPA and creates new privacy laws to replace it (Kerr, 2014). The ECPA should be considered top priority when it comes to being refo rmed. If Congress were to take in fresh on what changes to make on the ECPA the technologic changes would have to be particularly considered. existence that the cost of stored information has changed it also changes how law enforcements surveillance people, it threatens privacy. In 1986 this all make sense because the internet was designed at this time to only hold modified storage, and wire-tapping was a threat more than stored information (Kerr, 2014). Overall access to stored record has become the greatest privacy threat. Technology has changed enormously, now everything is stored. With everything being stored now in what we call The Cloud like mentioned before stored information begins to reveal the same level of elaborate as real time surveillance or real-time access (Kerr, 2014). Stored information has become more revealing an invasive. (Kerr, 2014).References_Cohen, J. E. (2013). What is Privacy For._ Harvard Law Review Association_,_ 126_(7), 1904,29. Retrieved from http/ /explosive detection system.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/explosive detection system/ exposit/detail?vid=5&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3ddb=edsgbe&AN=edsgcl.333333595__Kerr, 0. S. (2014). The Next Generation Communications Privacy Act._ University of Pennsylvania Law Review_,_ 162_(2), 373-419. Retrieved from http//eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/ involve/detail?vid=26&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3ddb=aph&AN=93917886__Libn, N. (2012). PRIVACY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE twenty-first CENTURY Foreword._ Harvard Law and Policy Review_,_ 6_, 263. Retrieved from http//eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=15&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3ddb=edslex&AN=edslex2F0EC940__Lipton, J. D. (2010). Digitlal Multi-Media and The Limits of Privacy Law._ Case westerly Reserve Journal of International Law_,_ 42_(3), 551-571. Retrieved from http//eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=24&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3ddb=bsh&AN=51909959__Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Chuan-Hoo, T., & Chee Wei, P. (2013). Addressing The Personalization-Privacy Paradox An Empirical estimation From a Field Experiment on Smartphone Users._ MIS Quarterly_,_ 37_(4), 1141-A5. Retrieved from http//eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=29&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3ddb=bsh&AN=91906295_